Notice: Undefined index: forum_id in /home/sites/herpetofauna.org.uk/public_html/forum_archive/forum_posts.php on line 69 Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /home/sites/herpetofauna.org.uk/public_html/forum_archive/forum_posts.php on line 73

RAUK - Archived Forum - adder sexing help

This contains the Forum posts up until the end of March, 2011. Posts may be viewed but cannot be edited or replied to - nor can new posts be made. More recent posts can be seen on the new Forum at http://www.herpetofauna.co.uk/forum/

Forum Home

adder sexing help:

This is Page 1

Author Message
mark bannister
Member
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
No. of posts: 5


View other posts by mark bannister
Posted: 12 Mar 2007
I'm trying to understand this adder sexing, but finding it difficult.

I observed about 8 different adders on my last trip (9th March, Lincolnshire), but none of them seemed particularly pale, so I assumed they were all females. However, after reading the post about rostral scale frame marking and seeing pictures of male adders arthat don't look so pale, I'm now not at all sure what I saw!

I have read that a female has a shorter tail than a male, but at this stage in my experience, I'm not sure what contitutes 'short'. Does anyone have a good comparison picture of the tail length of a female and a male?

Here are some pictures from my trip and my guess at the sex of each snake. As you can see I'm still a bit puzzled. Any comments welcome. The pictures are not particularly good, but maybe good enough to determine the sex?

adder1 - male due to tan colour dark black diamonds and rostral scale frame? Not sure what can be said about the tail.

adders2&3 - male due to pale tan colour, dark black diamonds and rostral scale frame? possible female underneath...but isn't it too early for this kind of behaviour?

 

adder4 -male due to tan colour dark black diamonds and rostral scale frame?

adder5 - ? similar coloration as adder4, but less distinct rostral scale frame

adder6 - ? similar coloration as adder4, but less distinct rostral scale frame and does this contitute a short tail or long tail?

 


Vicar
Senior Member
Joined: 02 Sep 2004
No. of posts: 1181


View other posts by Vicar
Posted: 12 Mar 2007
Mark,

I completely understand your difficulty. One of the problems you have is that many of the adders just emerging have yet to slough, and reveal their creamy background colour. Most of your snaps look like hibernation garb to me.

Although its in construction still, click on the www link below, and follow your nose to the adder page, some good (unreviewed) rules of thumb for determining gender are shown.

Steve Langham - Chairman    
Surrey Amphibian & Reptile Group (SARG).
herpetologic2
Senior Member
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
No. of posts: 1369


View other posts by herpetologic2
Posted: 12 Mar 2007

All those adders are male - including the female - Adders 2 & 3

The tan colour will go when they shed their skins - you will notice that the snakes have a lighter head colour from the neck upwards (just slightly)

I have some photos of tails for comparison I can post these ASAP

Jon 


Vice Chair of ARG UK - self employed consultant -
visit ARG UK & Alresford Wildlife
GemmaJF
Admin Group
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
No. of posts: 2090


View other posts by GemmaJF
Posted: 12 Mar 2007

I always describe the females tail as looking like an after thought, it isn't only shorter it looks like it was stuck on separately, whereas the males tails taper smoothly. Jon has some good pictures of this.

I would say all your images are of males - the stripe is practically pitch black and well defined in each as are the side blotches, at this time of year forget background colour, it is very misleading espececially in comparison with the 'wisdom' found in many text books.

You should find some threads on here from a couple of years ago when I was struggling with all this, now it seems obvious

(I shall now wait to be shot down in flames for getting it wrong LOL)


Gemma Fairchild, Independent Ecological Consultant
Peter Vaughan
Senior Member
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
No. of posts: 170


View other posts by Peter Vaughan
Posted: 12 Mar 2007

I cannot readily track down the information about rostral scale markings (what are they? I dimly remember reading something about them on the forum last year?) - can someone either signpost the relevant thread or otherwise explain please?

What I did discover from looking back at some of last year's Adder postings (including my own) is that the animal I saw yesterday that I recognised from March last year was behaving in the same way as then i.e. coiled-up, relatively languid and happier to be approached than other Adders out at the same time.  Coincidence or a sign of an individual behaviour trait (I suppose "personality" would be putting it too strong, and not a proper scientific term!).  Or is it just that the level of caution shown by an Adder changes with age?

Peter


Peter Vaughan
mark bannister
Member
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
No. of posts: 5


View other posts by mark bannister
Posted: 12 Mar 2007
For details of the rostrum scales, search for the title 'sexing reptiles'
Suzi
Senior Member
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
No. of posts: 860


View other posts by Suzi
Posted: 12 Mar 2007
There was a good male and female comparison put on here last year showing the different tails. I have it saved on my computer for reference. I must say I find all the colour thing difficult as a good number of adders I see are sort of muddy browny/olive colour at any stage of the season! Size, build and tail all help but if they're intertwined with vegetation and moving off sharpish it can be hard. I know, I know it gets easier with experience
Suz
GemmaJF
Admin Group
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
No. of posts: 2090


View other posts by GemmaJF
Posted: 13 Mar 2007

Seems I posted at the same time as Jon last night, simply repeating the same information.

The one key thing that is easy to spot is the stripe. Pitch black and high contrast to the background colour (whatever that might be i.e. pre-slough etc) is usually a male. The females tend to have lighter stripes which are less defined, usually brownish rather than pitch black - the same is true of the side blotches - you will spot this before anything else then you can look at tails etc.

Here are some females to compare to the images above, forget the background colour and look at the stripe - here the difference remains even with the pre-slough males above, the stripe is black in the animals above even though the background colour may currently appear to be brownish and thus typically female.


Gemma Fairchild, Independent Ecological Consultant
axel
Member
Joined: 16 May 2006
No. of posts: 31


View other posts by axel
Posted: 19 Mar 2007

I had never heard about using rostral scale markings to sex adders.  I have just finished trawling through my adder photos to check, and it is consistent.  The rostral colour has also help me ID a male that I have never been 100% on the sex.  However, last year I found a very large blue/silver 'male' adder with a black zig-zag.  I remember commenting at the time that 'he' was very well fed and almost looked gravid.  The rostral scale suggests it was a female.  I recall Thomas Madson has also reported blue female adders in his publications.  What are peoples thoughts on the sex?

Ax


Suzi
Senior Member
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
No. of posts: 860


View other posts by Suzi
Posted: 19 Mar 2007
I would say this was a male, yes?
Suz
Deano
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
No. of posts: 133


View other posts by Deano
Posted: 28 Mar 2007
Okay I am stupid. Could someone explain in plain english what is all this stuff about 'rostral scale markings' where are they and what is the difference between male/ female?
Deano
Better to be lucky than good looking.
Wolfgang Wuster
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
No. of posts: 326


View other posts by Wolfgang Wuster
Posted: 03 Apr 2007
[QUOTE=axel]

I had never heard about using rostral scale markings to sex adders. I have just finished trawling through my adder photos to check, and it is consistent. The rostral colour has also help me ID a male that I have never been 100% on the sex. However, last year I found a very large blue/silver 'male' adder with a black zig-zag. I remember commenting at the time that 'he' was very well fed and almost looked gravid. The rostral scale suggests it was a female. I recall Thomas Madson has also reported blue female adders in his publications. What are peoples thoughts on the sex?


[/QUOTE]

Hi Axel,

Colour says male, head shape says female to a point.

I don't think rostral coloration is as clear-cut as has been stated.

Here is the rostral of one specimen we caught yesterday:


Looks kind of female, right?

Now here's the tail:



I think that settles it as a male...

Cheers,

Wolfgang
Wolfgang Wüster
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor
http://sbsweb.bangor.ac.uk/~bss166/
Wolfgang Wuster
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
No. of posts: 326


View other posts by Wolfgang Wuster
Posted: 03 Apr 2007
[QUOTE=Deano] Okay I am stupid. Could someone explain in plain english what is all this stuff about 'rostral scale markings' where are they and what is the difference between male/ female?[/QUOTE]



The rostral is the scale pointed out by the arrow in the piccie above. The idea is that the rostral is strongly marked in black in males, and more uniform in females. In view of the adder shown in my previous post, I am not so convinced.

Cheers,

Wolfgang
Wolfgang Wüster
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor
http://sbsweb.bangor.ac.uk/~bss166/
Deano
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
No. of posts: 133


View other posts by Deano
Posted: 03 Apr 2007

Thanks for the info Wolfgang.

I agree with your comments on the pictures. Do people probe adders? I once saw what I thought was a female, purely because of size, but everything else was male - although I didn't know about rostral scales then. There is a wide variation in adder colours and patterns so maybe there are males that are a bit more feminine (to look at) and vice versa. Natural selection at work?


Deano
Better to be lucky than good looking.
herpetologic2
Senior Member
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
No. of posts: 1369


View other posts by herpetologic2
Posted: 03 Apr 2007

 

No need to probe adders I feel - and I wasnt convinced by the rostral scale colouration either - though this was from a german paper I believe and it led the guys n gals in Kent to rename an old adder known as knackered nora to knackered Norman or something like that

I normally go on the shape of the tail, colouration and the rostral scale markings may help with this - if you cannot be sure adult snake would suffice until such time you have seen other behaviours which suggest which sex etc

Jon

 


Vice Chair of ARG UK - self employed consultant -
visit ARG UK & Alresford Wildlife
B Lewis
Krag Committee
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
No. of posts: 146


View other posts by B Lewis
Posted: 03 Apr 2007

Hi All,

Firstly to Wolfgang... Your adder 'head-on' shot looks like a male to me using the described method for sexing adders by rostral and pre-nasal shields..

I refer to the link that gives straight forward examples but it should be used in conjunction with shape of tail and other colour variant like stripe definition if you are unsure.. See:

http://www.herpetofauna.co.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1560 &KW=rostral+scales

I am surpised that you all seem to doubt the obvious, I have now used this mehtod in a number of counties and not just Kent, thank you Jon, and it has worked extensively.. It comes with experience and clear photographing techniques in distant situtations.

Again I refer to the above image from Wolfgang, the flecks on pre-nasal shields and the colouration on the base of the rostral scale suggest a male adder to me.

Continue the good work folks and use what ever method you are confident with, for all other seek advice from those who know.

Checklist: Colouration (background and zig-zig), Tail shape, rostral scale and pre-nasal shield colouration or lack thereof, caudal scale counts (pairs)..

These methods should get you in the ball park and I'm sure your local ARGs could help out with the rest. Be sure that there are some individuals that do not fit any of the criteria, like smooth newts without spots on the chin.. Use a combination of techniques and you will gain more success with your animals.

Also to correct Jon's comment about Nackered 'Nobby'.. This animal had previously been described as a female but had not been caught or identified otherwise. On one ocassion I went out and had a good look at her (him) and decided that the colouration of rostral and pre-nasal shields showed that indeed it was a male. With Richard Griffiths we caught the animal, checked caudal scale count and for hemipenis and I was correct in identifying this early record as a male...! 'Nackered Nora' became 'Nackered Nobby' over night...!

Nackered because he had been beaten up over the years and has all kinds of scars and scale deformaties... Probably by badger and/or bird predation.

Kind regards

Brett Lewis

B Lewis39175.4988425926
Lewis Ecology
Brett Lewis Photography
Kent Reptile & Amphibian Group
DICE - University of Kent
herpetologic2
Senior Member
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
No. of posts: 1369


View other posts by herpetologic2
Posted: 03 Apr 2007

Hi Bret

the head on shot seems to have light borders and no rostral fleck as described in the methodology? though there is some dark marking to the borders of the rostral scale highlighted in new pic

 

Is that what you mean Bret?

Jon


Vice Chair of ARG UK - self employed consultant -
visit ARG UK & Alresford Wildlife
Wolfgang Wuster
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
No. of posts: 326


View other posts by Wolfgang Wuster
Posted: 03 Apr 2007
Brett,

I am not dissing Petra's approach - kudos to her for identifying the character, it certainly does work a lot of the time. I certainly haven't seen a female WITH the markings, so it is definitely of use in that way.

The head-on shot of the snake where I painted in an arrow (in response to Deano) was a male, and had the strong black markings described by Petra Burghardt. However, the piccie that Jon reposted above, with multiple arrows, looks quite different, having much less obvious dark rostral markings (although there are traces of it, and the internasals are slightly dark-edged, admittedly), and yet was clearly a male, given the shape of the tail. The Q is at what level the character is meant to be useful - in that particular snake, would you have ID'ed it as a male at a distance (based solely on the rostral coloration and ignoring other characters), or would the patches have been overlooked in anything but a close-up photo?

I'm not saying the character is useless, but I certainly think it will be worth assessing the applicability of the method to all populations, and in what observational context (close-up vs. field obs in situ). After all, Petra Burghardt herself wrote: "But there are also pictures of males (or adders that described as males) without a frame around the rostral and prenasal shields and/or without a rostral patch".

I think we shoud consider this as an invitation to test the method critically in further populations ;-)

Cheers,

Wolfgang
Wolfgang Wüster
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor
http://sbsweb.bangor.ac.uk/~bss166/
B Lewis
Krag Committee
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
No. of posts: 146


View other posts by B Lewis
Posted: 03 Apr 2007

Hi Jon, Wolfgang..

Jon, that is what I was refering to and shows the detail that you would look for. Although not the most obvious example.

Wolfgang,

I admit that it is not clear all the time and at times like this you should use other methods as you quite rightly did with the tail and possibly sub-caudal counts.. When Petra discussed those animals without markings I think she could have been refering to possible mis-identifications just as easily as abnormalities to the colour morph.

You should note that the rostral scale colouration does not have to be as coloured as your second image, but could simply be a frame around the rostral scale or darkened lines on the pre-nasal shields or any combination of those. In most cases females lack this colouration or have very faint shadows.

In all circumstances I think it right to test the hypothesis. I would be very interested in your/other people's populations to get a real grip of this. They would need to be compared with tails and sub-caudal counts to be certain I feel. All I can say is that here in Kent, it has been proven true with each animal we have encountered, captured and examined.

Can I also stress that observations like these should be used with caution when encountering animals pre-ecdysis as this time period may give an increased chance of a false -ve or +ve if used as the sole method of sex determination.

I look forward to hearing from those of you who would like the challenge of some real useful research..

Kind regards

Brett.

 

B Lewis39175.7940740741
Lewis Ecology
Brett Lewis Photography
Kent Reptile & Amphibian Group
DICE - University of Kent
Vicar
Senior Member
Joined: 02 Sep 2004
No. of posts: 1181


View other posts by Vicar
Posted: 03 Apr 2007
Brett,

If you can email me the original paper, I can get it translated. But only bother it you think it might be useful.

Steve

Steve Langham - Chairman    
Surrey Amphibian & Reptile Group (SARG).

- adder sexing help

This is Page 1

Content here